Who are the Salihoon in 21:105

Maulana Ayub Dehlavi on the interpretation of the word Salihoon in 21:105

In this audio Maulana Ayub Dehlavi criticizes the traditional interpretation of الصالحون as the righteous and present another meaning I e. the word Saalih refers to the one who has the ability to rule. The Ayat under discussion is:

{ وَلَقَدۡ كَتَبۡنَا فِی ٱلزَّبُورِ مِنۢ بَعۡدِ ٱلذِّكۡرِ أَنَّ ٱلۡأَرۡضَ یَرِثُهَا عِبَادِیَ ٱلصَّـٰلِحُونَ }
And We have written in Zabūr (Psalms) after the advice that the land will be inherited by My righteous slaves.
[Surah Al-Anbiyâ’: 105]

In this ayat 21:105, the word الأرض has been interpreted by the exegetes as meaning paradise or earth. For the meaning of Paradise following Ayat is cited:

{ وَقَالُوا۟ ٱلۡحَمۡدُ لِلَّهِ ٱلَّذِی صَدَقَنَا وَعۡدَهُۥ وَأَوۡرَثَنَا ٱلۡأَرۡضَ نَتَبَوَّأُ مِنَ ٱلۡجَنَّةِ حَیۡثُ نَشَاۤءُۖ فَنِعۡمَ أَجۡرُ ٱلۡعَـٰمِلِینَ }
And they will say, “AlHamdulillāh : Praise belongs to Allah who made His promise come true for us, and made us inherit the territory, so as we can dwell anywhere we wish in Jannah (Paradise) . So, excellent is the reward of those who did (good) deeds.[Surah Az-Zumar: 74]

And if the the meaning of earth is taken, then either it’s a general rule or a specific rule. Some exegetes say that it’s specific, with a difference of opinion on whom it’s specific to. Some say it’s specific to the Bani Israel according to the Ayat:

{ وَأَوۡرَثۡنَا ٱلۡقَوۡمَ ٱلَّذِینَ كَانُوا۟ یُسۡتَضۡعَفُونَ مَشَـٰرِقَ ٱلۡأَرۡضِ وَمَغَـٰرِبَهَا ٱلَّتِی بَـٰرَكۡنَا فِیهَاۖ وَتَمَّتۡ كَلِمَتُ رَبِّكَ ٱلۡحُسۡنَىٰ عَلَىٰ بَنِیۤ إِسۡرَ ٰ⁠ۤءِیلَ بِمَا صَبَرُوا۟ۖ وَدَمَّرۡنَا مَا كَانَ یَصۡنَعُ فِرۡعَوۡنُ وَقَوۡمُهُۥ وَمَا كَانُوا۟ یَعۡرِشُونَ }
We caused those people who were deemed to be weak (the Israelites) to inherit the East and West of the land that We had blessed. And the sublime word of your Lord was fulfilled for the children of Isrā’īl, because they stood patient; and We destroyed what Pharaoh and his people used to build and what they used to raise high. [Surah Al-A`râf: 137]

And Ibn Abbas رضي الله عنهما says that this Ayat is specific to the Ummat of Muhammad ﷺ, which is also aided by the Ayat:

{ وَعَدَ ٱللَّهُ ٱلَّذِینَ ءَامَنُوا۟ مِنكُمۡ وَعَمِلُوا۟ ٱلصَّـٰلِحَـٰتِ لَیَسۡتَخۡلِفَنَّهُمۡ فِی ٱلۡأَرۡضِ كَمَا ٱسۡتَخۡلَفَ ٱلَّذِینَ مِن قَبۡلِهِمۡ وَلَیُمَكِّنَنَّ لَهُمۡ دِینَهُمُ ٱلَّذِی ٱرۡتَضَىٰ لَهُمۡ وَلَیُبَدِّلَنَّهُم مِّنۢ بَعۡدِ خَوۡفِهِمۡ أَمۡنࣰاۚ یَعۡبُدُونَنِی لَا یُشۡرِكُونَ بِی شَیۡـࣰٔاۚ وَمَن كَفَرَ بَعۡدَ ذَ ٰ⁠لِكَ فَأُو۟لَـٰۤىِٕكَ هُمُ ٱلۡفَـٰسِقُونَ }
Allah has promised those of you who believe and do good deeds that He will certainly make them (His) vicegerents in the land, as He made those before them, and will certainly establish for them their religion which He has chosen for them, and will certainly give them peace in place of fear in which they were before; (provided that) they worship Me, ascribing no partner to Me. And those who turn infidel after that are the transgressors. [Surah An-Nûr: 55]

Shia exegetes make it specific to their twelfth Imam Mahdi and his followers. [***]

Or this Ayat is general in it’s application i.e. only those who are Saalih will inherit the earth.

Maulana Ayub Dehlavi’s referred audio pertains to this interpretation only since in all the other interpretations the meaning of Saalih as righteous is established. Maulana translates the word Saalih as the one who has the ability to rule while the traditional exegetes translate it as righteous.

Following Ayaat are cited for support of the traditional interpretation:

{ وَقَالَ ٱلَّذِینَ كَفَرُوا۟ لِرُسُلِهِمۡ لَنُخۡرِجَنَّكُم مِّنۡ أَرۡضِنَاۤ أَوۡ لَتَعُودُنَّ فِی مِلَّتِنَاۖ فَأَوۡحَىٰۤ إِلَیۡهِمۡ رَبُّهُمۡ لَنُهۡلِكَنَّ ٱلظَّـٰلِمِینَ }
The disbelievers said to their prophets, “We shall certainly expel you from our land unless you come back to our faith.” So, their Lord revealed to them, “We shall destroy the transgressors, [Surah Ibrâhîm: 13]
{ وَلَنُسۡكِنَنَّكُمُ ٱلۡأَرۡضَ مِنۢ بَعۡدِهِمۡۚ ذَ ٰ⁠لِكَ لِمَنۡ خَافَ مَقَامِی وَخَافَ وَعِیدِ }
and shall certainly let you dwell in the land after them. This is for the one who is fearful of standing before Me and is fearful of My warning.” [Surah Ibrâhîm: 14]
{ قَالَ مُوسَىٰ لِقَوۡمِهِ ٱسۡتَعِینُوا۟ بِٱللَّهِ وَٱصۡبِرُوۤا۟ۖ إِنَّ ٱلۡأَرۡضَ لِلَّهِ یُورِثُهَا مَن یَشَاۤءُ مِنۡ عِبَادِهِۦۖ وَٱلۡعَـٰقِبَةُ لِلۡمُتَّقِینَ }
Mūsā said to his people, “Seek help from Allah and be patient. Surely, the land belongs to Allah. He lets whomsoever He wills inherit it from among His servants; and the end-result is in favor of the God-fearing.” [Surah Al-A`râf: 128]

Also a verse in Psalms echoes the traditional interpretation:

‘The righteous shall inherit the land, and dwell therein forever.’ Psalms 37:29, KJV BIBLE

Maulana’s argument against the traditional interpretation is that of historical nature, that we have seen that righteous aka Muslims, don’t always rule the earth, so the traditional interpretation is untenable. But for the correct interpretation we need to take the word’s lexical meaning i.e. somebody with requisite abilities (to rule). The Ayat then translates to ‘.. that the Earth shall be inherited by my slaves who possess requisite abilities to rule’. This interpretation can withstand the criticism of the Historical argument, Maulana surmised, as this does not presuppose the piety of the ruler; so throughout the history whoever ruled, he ruled because of his ruling abilities, not because he belonged to certain belief.

Due to following reasons Maulana’s argument becomes weak:
1. The context of the Ayat dictates that the inheritance of the Earth is a blessing accorded to Allah’s pious servants due to their piety rather than just a historical principle.
2. The traditional interpretation is also fully commensurate with another Ayat:

{ وَلَا تَهِنُوا۟ وَلَا تَحۡزَنُوا۟ وَأَنتُمُ ٱلۡأَعۡلَوۡنَ إِن كُنتُم مُّؤۡمِنِینَ }
Do not lose heart and do not grieve, and you are the upper-most if you are believers.
[Surah Âl-`Imrân: 139]

3. The above Ayat also answers Maulana’s observation of non universality both temporal and spatial, of Muslim rule; Since the Ayat guarantees success only if one is a true Muslim, so when Muslims are subjugated, the main cause is the detriment in their faith while other factors like unpreparedness for war etc are just the manifestations of this weak faith.

4. Also in the Ayah 55 of Surah Al Nur quoted above, Allah Ta’aala promises the Caliphate over the world, solely as a consequence of Belief and Good deeds for the future, and establishes the same criteria for the past as well.

Allah has promised those of you who believe and do good deeds that He will certainly make them (His) vicegerents in the land, as He made those before them, and will certainly establish for them their religion which He has chosen for them, and will certainly give them peace in place of fear in which they were before; (provided that) they worship Me, ascribing no partner to Me. And those who turn infidel after that are the transgressors.

[Surah An-Nûr: 55]

[***] https://www.al-islam.org/enlightening-commentary-light-holy-quran-vol-10/section-7-righteous-shall-inherit-earth

The Imran Khan Revolution

Lets compare Imran Khan’s ‘Revolution’ with the standard revolutions.
1. Tyrant
a.Gen Batista for Castro (Cuban Revolution)
b.Zahir Shah for Khomeini (Iranian Revolution)
c.Tzar Nicholas for Lenin (Russian Revolution)
d.King Louis XVI for Robespierre (French Revolution)
e.Gen Franco for the Anarchists (Spanish Revolution)
f. Nawaz Sharif for IK

2. Purpose
All purported to rid the masses of the tyrannical rule of the tyrants.

3. Method
a. Guerrilla Warfare
b. massive & bloody agitation
c. Do
d. Do
e. Geurrilla Warfare
f. Begging NS to step down

As Mao Zedong puts it very aptly, “Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun” [1], no tyrant would ever give away his power to the powerless without use of power against him. By begging NS to step down, is IK trying to bring a revolution or trying to disillusion the true revolutionaries from the very word of Revolution. This kind of botched attempts to overthrow the tyrant arouse revulsions in the intelligentsia of a society – which provide the steam for any revolution – towards any subsequent adventurer who steps forward as the harbinger of change. I don’t want to sound arrogant but the fact is that the intelligentsia of our society is not supporting IK.

It might be argued that the necessary power to dethrone the tyrant would have been offered by the proverbial Third Umpire but that also seems to be out of question by now, but even if that was the power, it would have been very detrimental to the cause of revolution, since it would amount only to the change of tyrants.

Another big factor is the team that would take over the affairs of country after the revolution, and the team that IK has mustered is the same that had been in the Governments for the past thirty or so years. So without judging their current intentions there is a substantial likelihood of their maleficence.

I, for one, want revolution, but a revolution sans intelligence is not my definition of change.

——————

[1] Every Communist must grasp the truth, “Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.” Our principle is that the Party commands the gun, and the gun must never be allowed to command the Party. Yet, having guns, we can create Party organizations, as witness the powerful Party organizations which the Eighth Route Army has created in northern China. We can also create cadres, create schools, create culture, create mass movements. Everything in Yenan has been created by having guns. All things grow out of the barrel of a gun. According to the Marxist theory of the state, the army is the chief component of state power. Whoever wants to seize and retain state power must have a strong army. Some people ridicule us as advocates of the “omnipotence of war”. Yes, we are advocates of the omnipotence of revolutionary war; that is good, not bad, it is Marxist. The guns of the Russian Communist Party created socialism. We shall create a democratic republic. Experience in the class struggle in the era of imperialism teaches us that it is only by the power of the gun that the working class and the labouring masses can defeat the armed bourgeoisie and landlords; in this sense we may say that only with guns can the whole world be transformed. We are advocates of the abolition of war, we do not want war; but war can only be abolished through war, and in order to get rid of the gun it is necessary to take up the gun.

— Selected Works of Mao Tse-tung, Vol. II, pp. 224-225

Exegesis or Eisegesis – A Critique.

This article (part I, part II) contains irreligious overtones, while it’s central theme is bluntly anti-Islamic and based upon quite a few whimsical premises. Ignoring the Hadith as a superseding source of exegesis over Arabic lexicon is reminiscent of Khawaarij.

Incorrect Main Premise

The author also wrongly attributed a statement (Quran is but ink and paper and ultimately it is a human enterprise which makes sense of it) of Khawaarij to Hazrat Ali r.a. which renders his stance decrepit. It is actually the statement of Khawaarij, who went against Hazrat Ali r.a. citing a verse [1] from Qur’an and using their intellect/lexicon to interpret it wrongly.

فلما أن بلغ عليا ما عتبوا عليه وفارقوه عليه، أمر فأذن مؤذن أن لا يدخل على أمير المؤمنين رجل إلا رجلا قد حمل القرآن، فلما أن امتلات الدار من قراء الناس دعا بمصحف إمام عظيم فوضعه بين يديه فجعل يصكه بيده ويقول: أيها المصحف ! حدث الناس فناداه الناس فقالوا: يا أمير المؤمنين ما تسأل عنه إنما هو مداد في ورق، ونحن نتكلم بما روينا منه، فماذا تريد ؟

 [ Al Bidayah wan Nihayah, v7, p310-11]

Enterprise of interpretation

It is Allah’s enterprise solely to interpret what is in the Qur’an, as stated in

75:19 “Then, it is undertaken by Us to explain it.”

And Prophet Muhammad’s sallallaaho alaihi wasallam task of explaining the Qur’an is also carried out based upon divine revelation as stated in

16:44 … And We sent down the Reminder (The Qur’an) to you, so that you explain to the people what has been revealed for them…

53:3,4 He does not speak out of (his own) desire. It is but revelation revealed (to him).  

And Arabic lexicon is another way of interpretation in those Ayaat which do not contain probability of more than one meanings i.e. Muhkamaat, as stated in

12:2 We have sent it down, as an Arabic Qur‘an, so that you may understand.


Patriarchy or Gender Equality

Also the unwritten premise of the article that Patriarchy is unreasonable and there should/must be equality between the genders is also baseless and has no foundation in Qur’an. Rather Quran goes against this theme e.g.

2:228 – …Women have rights similar to what they owe in recognized manner though for men there is a step above them…

2:282 – …Have two witnesses from among your men, and if two men are not there, then one man and two women from those witnesses whom you like…

3:36 – …And Allah knew better what she had delivered, and the male was not like the female…

4:3 – …marry the women you like, in twos, in threes and in fours…

4:176 – …the male will get a share equal to that of two females.

12:109 – We did not send before you (Messengers) other than men…

16:43 – We did not send before you (Messengers) other than men…

21:7 – And We did not send before you (Messengers) other than men…

The author blames Orthodox exegetes of ‘pre-understanding ‘ while he is perpetrating it himself by espousing gender equality. Ibn Warraq has the same problem with Islam, that it’s inherently Patriarchal, he says,

“She is forbidden to (1) be a head of state; (2) be a judge; (3) be an imam; (4) be a guardian;(5) leave her house without permission of her guardian or husband; (6) have a tete-a-tete with a strange man; (7) shake a man’s hand; (8) put on makeup or perfume outside the house; (9) uncover her face for fear of “temptation”;(10) travel alone; (11) inherit the same amount as a man—she must make do with half; (12) bear witness in cases of hudud (see page 310) and accept that her testimony is worth only half that of a man; (13) perform the religious rituals when menstruating; (14) choose where she will live before she is ugly or old; (15) marry without permission from her guardian; (16) marry a non-Muslim; and (17) divorce her spouse.” [Why I am not a Muslim, page 321]

Owing to revelations of this kind he chose not to be a Muslim. But then one has to be objective in finding out the rational basis for the equality of genders if he is a non Muslim or some scriptural basis if he is a Muslim. But none can furnish any evidence rational or scriptural to the effect of plausibility of gender equality.

Qur’an’s Immutability

Qur’an claims Hermeneutic consistency in 4:82[2], and which is also one of the basis of Qur’an’s immutability and transcendental nature. So if Qur’an’s theme is patriarchal (as shown before) then every attempt to extract non patriarchal meanings from it would be tantamount to perpetration of corrupting the meaning (Tahreef i Ma’nawi) of Qur’an.

Also saying that the meanings of Qur’an changes with the change of time/reader/culture etc, also amounts to Tahreef i Ma’nawi. From 3:7[3], it is obvious that Qur’an has two kinds of Ayaat, Muhkamaat and Mutashaabihaat. Muhkamaat Ayaat are the essence of Qu’ran, and they are crystal clear (have no chance of more than one meaning) and must be acted upon by all and sundry while Mutashaabihaat are the Ayaat which has chances of more than one meaning, they must be interpreted in the light of Muhkamaat. The people who try to interpret these Mutashabihaat without regards of Muhkamaat are termed as Khawaarij by Prophet Muhammad sallallaaho alaihi wasallam.[4] So what would that person be termed as who wants to change the meaning of Muhkamaat? Ayat 41:40 does shed some light on these kind of people.

41:40 Surely those who adopt perversity about Our verses are not hidden from Us. So, tell me which one is better: the one who is thrown into the Fire, or the one who will come safely on the Day of Judgement? Do whatever you wish. He is watchful of whatever you do.

—————————————————————-

[1] 12:40,67 – ….Sovereignty belongs to none but Allah…

[2] 4:82 – Do they not, then, ponder about the Qur’an? Had it been from someone other than Allah, they would have found in it a great deal of discrepancy.

[3] 3:7 – He is the One who has revealed to you the Book (the Qur’an). Out of it there are verses that are MuHkamat (ofestablished meaning), which are the principal verses of the Book, and some others are Mutashabihat (whose definite meanings are unknown). Now those who have perversity in their hearts go after such part of it as is mutashabih, seeking (to create) discord, and searching for its interpretation (that meets their desires), while no one knows its interpretation except Allah; and those well-grounded in knowledge say: We believe therein; all is from our Lord. Only the men of understanding observe the advice.

[4] Tafseer Ibn Katheer, vol 2, page 9